Tuesday, September 27, 2005

Web 2.1: Taking Back the Revolution from Big Money

It seems that big money and corporate interests are trying to seize stewardship of the overall concept of Web 2.0 - though the current Wikipedia article credits the folks at Web 2.0 Conference with coining the phrase, I understand it came from an authentic human being who will remain nameless until I get further validation on this. So perhaps I should not be too shocked at this.

But I was really shocked when I went to register for the Web 2.0 Conference and found that it cost $2,800 to attend. This means that most of the real movers and shakers of this movement are not going to be there - which might be fine considering it is geared at a different audience and has a different purpose than a Gnomedex or BarCamp event. As a friend mentioned the other day, the leaders who will be there are either going because they are speaking, they received a comp pass from John or Tim because they are FooCamp worthy or because they are backed by VC's who are ponying up the cash (of course traditional multinational corps will also be willing to pay up).

As an unfunded Web 2.0 startup, without the juice to merit a comp pass, I wont be there

So I have been thinking about trying to organize a BarCamp styled BrainJam for the rest of us who are in the trenches of this next wave. It is time for us to seize the reins of the evolution ourselves - it is time for us to let those big money interests have the Web 2.0 - it is time we launched Web 2.1

I can't imagine a better way to seize it back than to organize a BrainJam that focuses on how we can put the consumer back into the center of consumer generated content and restructure this movement. Let's look at and define some of the goals we all want to see happen - let's empower each other with the knowledge necessary to make it happen - let's bring technology people together with business people and have a meeting of the minds to set the true north on our compass. This is not exclusionary in any regards - there is even room for traditional media as a participant, but they are just networks of individual citizen journalists/writer/editors rather than the gate keepers of truth and knowledge and passion. As I have often said, an idea, a focused question, some minimal structure and some bright minds can result in massive and positive change.

I propose we put together a Web2point1 Conference for next Friday October 7, 2005 somewhere here in San Francisco. We can charge $2.80 for people to attend - providing 1000x the take away value for 1/1000th of the cost - a factor of a million times better than Web 2.0. While Barry Diller won't be attending our BrainJam, the next Barry Diller just might be... The minimal structure will focus on the question "What do we need to do with the technology to get to the future in which we want to live? What does that future really look like?" Separate working sessions could address certain aspects of the problem. This structure is merely a suggested starting point for pre-BrainJam discussion - ultimately the focus will be decided upon by the participants.

I can't do this alone, so I need your help. We need a space with open WiFi, organizers and bodies - we need to mobilize as soon as possible. We also need some sponsors to pony up some green to cover basic expenses, any profit will be donated to the Internet Archive (though I would not expect profitability from something like this, it would be nice to think in that direction at least). Perhaps the folks at TechCrunch might be interested in helping to organize this?

Is anyone else out there interested in making this real???

22 Comments:

At Tuesday, September 27, 2005 6:29:00 PM, Anonymous Brian Shields said...

Let me know how I can help, Chris. I have a request in for a press pass to the other event but I've been told they're by "invite" only. Still waiting to see if I rate.

But either way, would be delighted to be part of 2.1.

 
At Tuesday, September 27, 2005 9:44:00 PM, Anonymous Ken Yarmosh said...

Chris...you are in luck. Our blogoposium - Communicating the Ideas Behind Web 2.0 - just kicked off. Bloggers across the web are weighing in Web 2.0 and then tagging their posts, so that we can all keep track of the conversation. Consider it a Web 2.0 conference for the rest of us.

Hope to "see" you there.

 
At Wednesday, September 28, 2005 2:36:00 PM, Anonymous ryan king said...

I'm underfunded and therefore in!

 
At Wednesday, September 28, 2005 4:36:00 PM, Anonymous Anonymous said...

Chris:

What's your unfunded startup? I'm scanning your page but not seeing a link to it...

 
At Thursday, September 29, 2005 12:31:00 PM, Anonymous Andrew Watson said...

I participated in Ken's blogoposium. If I can contribute from Boston to an affordable event in San Francisco, let me know how!
Andrew: changingway.net

 
At Thursday, September 29, 2005 12:54:00 PM, Blogger Chris Heuer said...

Just wanted to clarify to anonymous poster that the new startup is Insytes.com (not live) and if you want to talk about it, I am happy to discuss it so you can contact me through http://www.chrisheuer.com/

 
At Friday, October 14, 2005 3:43:00 AM, Anonymous Lyndon said...

I reached this page via
http://www.buzzmachine.com/index.php/2005/10/10/the-best-thing-i-saw-at-web-20/

Brilliant stuff, just heard about what you guys are up to and I love it.

I'm in. Whatever it is, I'm in.

 
At Friday, June 30, 2006 6:48:00 AM, Blogger Valstrahn said...

I realise its a bit late, but I have just been delving into this in more detail at my MindSpace Art Blog/Podcst.

In addition to sharing my two cents worth, I mention how it is actually quite dammaging for this issue to remain largely unresolved (even though O'Reilly has backed down) and I propose a similar solution to yours above:

So I propose an interesting solution to this issue. I think from now on, everyone should refuse to refer to the term "Web 2.0" and instead use the term "Web 2.1". Not only does this give O'Reilly no leg to stand on, it also sends a clear message that the social web will not stand for corporate intimidation. So in this way, it is describing a new version of the web, which justifies an incremental version increase. And with an almost self prophetic irony, it is creating a new version of the web that the term itself ushers in. Web 2.0 has been around long enough for it to look significantly different now compared to when it first emerged, so I think it is high time to evolve to Web 2.1. Web 2.1 can also represent the related fights for Internet Neutrality (www.savetheinternet.com and www.itsournet.org) and Free Culture (www.lessig.org and www.eff.org).

To pre-empt any future issues, I'll state that not only Web 2.1, but Web X.X can now be considered a generic term, so no one can own trademark control over it in the future.

Of course, the only way for the term Web 2.1 to become completely generic and for people to be free of unacceptable corporate restrictions and intimidation is for this idea to be spread and used. Ideally, it should not be used blindly, but should be used with knowledge of what it represents and why it became necessary.


I've now dug a little deeper, and found that there are quite a few of us proposed that incrementing Web 2.0 is a good idea, which is great - it might just catch on yet. I have listed quite a number of them in my post.

 
At Wednesday, January 27, 2010 11:36:00 PM, Blogger Sangeeta said...

I appreciate this wonderful blog!!

SEO Services

 
At Friday, March 26, 2010 7:42:00 PM, Blogger rootpp said...

funny jokes

 
At Thursday, November 11, 2010 2:41:00 AM, Anonymous Web Design Company said...

Nice information, many thanks to the author. It is incomprehensible to me now, but in general, the usefulness and significance is overwhelming. Thanks again and good luck! Web Design Company

 
At Friday, July 08, 2011 3:14:00 AM, Anonymous Virtual Assistant Services said...

Thank you to tell us so much useful information. So nice sharing. I’m glad to read it.

 
At Wednesday, August 03, 2011 2:53:00 AM, Anonymous Liposuction chicago said...

Wow, Fantastic article, it’s so helpful to me, and your blog is very good,

 
At Monday, August 29, 2011 5:51:00 AM, Anonymous Fort Lauderdale criminal lawyer said...

This is a GREAT post! I hope you not mind. I published an excerpt on the site and linked back to your own blog for people to read the full version. Thanks for your advice.

 
At Monday, September 05, 2011 11:58:00 PM, Anonymous Gwinnett Septic Tank Pumping said...

Simply want to say your article is as surprising. The clearness in your post is simply great and i can assume you are an expert on this subject. Fine with your permission let me to grab your RSS feed to keep up to date with forthcoming post. Thanks a million and please continue the rewarding work.

 
At Tuesday, September 06, 2011 9:58:00 PM, Anonymous Panny acution said...

I just couldn’t leave your website before telling you that we really enjoyed the quality information you offer to your visitors… Will be back often to check up on new posts.

 
At Monday, November 21, 2011 8:01:00 PM, Anonymous Vancouver Internet Marketing said...

Another informative blog… Thank you for sharing it… Best of luck for further endeavor too.

 
At Sunday, March 04, 2012 11:10:00 PM, Anonymous web designing company said...

Excellent topic..really too impressing..thanks for you best efforts presented here.

 
At Monday, March 19, 2012 10:18:00 PM, Anonymous Vancouver Chiropractor said...

Thanks you. Very good post.Unless they can offer a really compelling reason for users to come back, it will be the next Bebo, MySpace.

 
At Tuesday, March 20, 2012 10:18:00 PM, Anonymous Gerard Butler Workout said...

This is a GREAT post! I hope you not mind. I published an excerpt on the site and linked back to your own blog for people to read the full version. Thanks for your advice.

 
At Tuesday, March 20, 2012 10:32:00 PM, Anonymous Jennifer Aniston workout said...

This blog is awesome full of useful information that i was in dire need of.

 
At Sunday, January 13, 2013 10:55:00 PM, Blogger rocky case said...

Stephen Stapinski

Really your blog is very interesting.... it contains great and unique information. I enjoyed to visiting your blog. It's just amazing.... Thanks very much for the share.

 

Post a Comment

<< Home